Our company recently availed ourselves of a Bell Atlantic Mobile offer in the Washington, DC (00018) market offering unlimited off-peak and weekend airtime, and (I presumed) now standard no-local toll charge features. BAMS has been generally trying to move customers off of analog plans by withdrawing special features like package Call-Waiting, Call-Forwarding, Three-Way calling (collectively "Custom Calling") features, unlimited off peak rates (so much so they cancelled *existing* NY analog plans' off peak features and "allowed" [they didn't have a choice!] customers under such plans to terminate without early termination charges), etc. So I thought is strange that they would be offering a special plan in the DC market (promoted in local papers and on their Web site) which seems to go against the general company policy of getting rid of analog accounts. (A policy, which BTW, is quite unfair to customers who live in less densely populated areas which BAMS generally and to a degree by necessity doesn't cover as well, so these people NEED 3 watt analog phones in order to place and receive calls reliably, yet can't avail themselves of the best rate plans and service options simply because they live somewhere where BAMS doesn't see as much need to improve coverage...so these customers don't get cellular service, BAMS says "there's no demand there", and unless they are below the FCC required de minimis RF levels, don't improve coverage, putting people who live in rural areas served by BAMS and other similar carriers in a lesser position in terms of cellular service offerings. It would be as if living 150 miles from a city meant it would be acceptable to have landline service which worked only 40% of the time, although the expectation is that no matter where you live your landline service will work approaching 100% of the time.) In any event, after speaking with Shelly at the inbound telemarketing office (800) 366-0043 for the DC market, I was told that the plan was indeed unlimited off-peak with no charge for local calls in the BAMS/DC-Baltimore local calling area. The account was set up in a day or so, and worked fine, although I note BAMS was getting very cheap by not even offering call-waiting or three-way calling (it just makes more money for them, so I'm not sure why they don't just offer it by default, especially the call-waiting). The bill just arrived a few days ago, and I noted some significant errors: 1. Calls within the BAMS/DC-Baltimore local calling area were charged at 4 to 8 cents per call, NOT COUNTING the airtime component. 2. Off-peak (and weekend) calls were billed at 50 cents per minute -- thus, the unlimited off-peak component of the plan was not reflected. 3. The "Welcome" letter we received from BAMS, which outlines the selected rateplan and service agreement, didn't have any mention of the unlimited off-peak rateplan for one year, etc. I called up the DC support number and they claim that they are having some problems with the analog unlimited off-peak plans, and it will need to be manually credited until the issues are resolved. I then asked about the local toll charges, and their claim was that this was standard, even though I was told by the sales rep (Shelly) that they no longer assessed these charges, which is consistent with their policies in most of their other markets for analog accounts, including NY Metro (00022), CT-A/Wallingford (00119), Boston (00028), Manchester (00428), Poughkeepsie (00486), and Orange (00404). I escalated the matter since the reason I accepted their offer for service was based to a large extent on the no local toll charge offering, and will expect them to honor that (as well as the unlimited off peak airtime, which they said they will eventually correct). Bell Atlantic customers in Washington DC and Baltimore who signed up for service during January 2000 under this promotion may care to closely scrutinize their bills to ensure that these billing errors are corrected and any overcharges refunded/credited to their accounts. I think I spend more time correcting these billing errors and inconsistencies in their service offerings that I (and perhaps collecitvely the whole company) spends talking on the phone! :) (This post and other cellular/CDPD posts and issues are also available at: http://www.wirelessnotes.org)